Why isn't this hate speech? Imagine a similar article about the female counterpart (most gender stereotypes have a counterpart in the opposite sex). Do you think a male writer (or even a female one) could get away with it?
Am I bothered because perhaps I am a "whimpster"? I don't think so. I guess I could be one, but, well, so what? Nah, I'm just sick of misandry dressed up as half-jokey, half-serious crap like this. Get a life, "Ms" Elder.
Monday, September 05, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(85)
-
▼
September
(25)
- 'A place for parents to turn to'
- Fragmentation
- Inspiritational quote
- Whups.
- Close to Home
- Conspiracy theories
- MRA-baiting and victim cards
- Hate Male Post: How Men Are Put Down And How To Ge...
- Feminists are not the modern Victorians.
- Pandagon: Possibly the most ineffective protest st...
- "We are change makers", says Blair
- Fathers' group scales Parliament
- Strange Child Support 'Reasons'
- Is there a right to have a father?
- Why male victims of DV don't come forward.
- The devil's greatest trick was to convince the wor...
- Women: The Forgotten Child Murderers
- A victim's victim
- ifeminists.com > editorial > Parental Alienation S...
- British men finally get their say
- Are you helping to "Cure the Radical Feminist Canc...
- Bad science not bad dads.
- anne - Another Real Life Heartless Bitch
- MEET THE WHIMPSTER: THE MANIPULATIVE ASSHOLE IN SE...
- Struck dumb.
-
▼
September
(25)
RSS
2 comments:
I agree with you. Women like that have low self esteem and like dating "bad boys" so they can reinforce how crappy they feel about themselves. A man who treats them well makes them feel undeserving. So, basically, these women just reinforce their own stupidity.
Not sure it's hate speech, but either way, it says more about her idiocy than men's.
Modern day women would eat the whimpster alive and send him running back to his momma.
Post a Comment